• About
  • Contact
  • Staff
  • Home
  • Essays
  • Forum
  • Podcasts
  • Book Reviews
  • Liberty Classics

February 3, 2020|ACLU, global justice, International Law, Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum, Marvin Flaherty, Medellin v. Texas, Roper v. Simmons

The Progressive Jurist’s Burden

by Jeremy A. Rabkin|

When Flaherty argues for a "global judiciary," he means a better American judiciary to speak—when convenient—in the name of "the world community."

May 1, 2018|Cuba, International Court of Justice, International Criminal Court, International Law, Law of Nations, The Schooner Exchange, US Constitution

An Originalist Reading of the Law of Nations

by Robert J. Delahunty|

The Peace Palace, seat of the International Court of Justice, July 2017 (Ankor Light / Shutterstock.com)
How should we think about the relationship between the US Constitution and the law of nations?

July 3, 2017|Declaration of Independence, foreign law, Garry Wills, International Law, Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Our Declaration of Independence from Foreign Law

by John O. McGinnis|

gavel

This Sunday, in the print edition of the New York Times Magazine, Garry Wills joined Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in contending that the Declaration of Independence favors interpreting our Constitution in light of foreign law. They note that the Declaration is prompted by a “decent respect for the opinions of mankind.” The colonists are moved by that respect to recount publicly the causes of their need for separation from Britain. Wills and Ginsburg appear to believe the same decent respect should encourage Americans, including our justices, to resort to foreign law to help construe our Constitution.

But using this sonorous phrase of  the Declaration as a support for resorting to foreign or international law has defects that are obvious from the text and context of the great document itself. First, the Declaration makes clear that this “decent respect” requires us to explain our own views to the world, not accept the views of others.

Second, the Signers appealed to a combination of natural law and their own historic rights as justification for their break with the mother country. They did not refer to foreign and international law as support for their position. For good reason. The Enlightenment age in which Declaration was written may have been cosmopolitan, as Wills argues. But the sovereign law in the monarchies of Europe and in despotisms elsewhere were not noticeably solicitous of the rights, like representation and freedom from unreasonable searches, that the Framers thought their birthright.

Read More

September 26, 2014|Customary International Law, Eleanor Roosevelt, FDR, Human Rights, International Law, United Nations

The Truth is Marching On

by Robert J. Delahunty|

Conference leaders at Church services during the Atlantic Charter Conference.

The universal human rights régime, under which we live, originated in response to the racial and other atrocities committed by Nazi Germany and its allies. The architects of the post-War system intended to institutionalize the liberal and egalitarian vision that had animated the Allied war effort. Drawing from the constitutional practices of liberal Western societies, they placed the rights-bearing individual at the center of the new global order.  They thus refashioned the pre-War states system in four major ways.

Read More

December 8, 2013|Diplomacy, Foreign Policy, International Law, U.S.-China relationship

When the Prince Flunks Diplomacy 101

by Angelo M. Codevilla|

Obama Speaks At Holocaust Days Of Remembrance CeremonyBy its handling of China’s claim of a defense zone in international waters, Obama & co. violated diplomacy’s timeless fundamentals. First they loudly declared that America continues to regard the zone as international waters, and sent nuclear-capable B-52 bombers into the area to underline the point. Then they told US airline companies that the US government would not try to protect them in these international waters and advised them to submit to Chinese authority therein. Finally, when the Japanese government asked for US support for its own claims in the area, Vice President Biden told the Japanese to deal with China as best they can – much as the Administration had told US citizens. People who act this way should not be allowed near positions of power. They could not pass a basic exam in the field.

Read More

November 10, 2013|Constitution, Emer de Vattel, Hugo Grotius, International Law, Slavery, The Rights of War and Peace

An Oppressive Power From the Beginning

by David C. Hendrickson|

Eliga Gould has written an intriguing new history of the diplomatic engagement of the United States in the long period spanning the Seven Years’ War to the Monroe Doctrine. It is different from most such histories of foreign policy in registering the perspective of various excluded groups—French Acadians who were expelled from their homeland in 1761 by Great Britain; loyalists consigned to exile by the American Revolution; the Native American nations and British hangers-on who contested possession of the Ohio Valley and the southern borderlands from the Peace of 1763 to Jackson’s War on the Seminoles in 1818; pirates and…

Read More

May 20, 2012|Bricker Amendment, Customary International Law, Executive Power, Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, International Law, John Yoo, Julian Ku, Taming Globalization

Taming International Law with Presidential Supremacy

by Ted Galen Carpenter|

Editor's Note: John Yoo responds here There has long been a tension between the requirements of the U.S. Constitution and the commitments of the United States under international law.  Indeed, that tension surfaced early in the history of the new republic.  The revolutionary government in France—and many of its American supporters—argued that the United States was obligated under its treaty of alliance to help that country in its armed struggles against Great Britain and other conservative European monarchies who sought to overturn the revolution.  Alexander Hamilton and other advisers to President George Washington, however, argued successfully that the United States had…

Read More

May 6, 2012|

Facilitating not Hindering American Compliance with International Law

by John Cerone|

In response to: Debating Sovereignty: Globalization, International Law, and the United States Constitution

State sovereignty is the fundamental building block of the international legal system.  International Law, much like the US Constitution, is at once an expression of, and self-imposed limitation upon, sovereignty.  At the same time, international law is much less of a limitation on US sovereignty than is the US Constitution, and rightly so. Today’s international legal system is a strongly positivist, consent-based system.  In general, states are not bound by any rules of international law that they have not themselves created or otherwise consented to.  While states have chosen to greatly expand the scope and substance of international law, most of…

Read More

More Responses

Bolstering American Sovereignty with Treaties

by Roger Alford

Concerns about sovereignty in an age of globalization are common, and often take a defensive posture that seeks to limit the reach of international law.   But sovereignty and international law are not incompatible.  Broadly understood, sovereignty may be defined as the advancement of the national interest, and the reality of globalization requires the United States…

Read More

March 14, 2012|Constitutionalism, globalism, International Law, John Yoo

The Transnationalists are Coming!

by Richard M. Reinsch II|

In this edition of Liberty Law Talk, I speak with John Yoo about how the American Constitution should interact with the proliferating sources of international law in treaties, conventions, agreements, and customary international law.  A growing array of transnationalist legal scholars believe international law should be more easily incorporated into America’s constitutional and domestic law however much it may interfere with popular consent. Yoo’s new book, co-authored with Julian Ku, Taming Globalization: International Law, the U.S. Constitution, and the New World Order, provides sturdy constitutional arguments for dealing with these questions. The Constitution's core structure of separation of powers and…

Read More

March 14, 2012|Constitutionalism, Federalism, International Law, Separation of Powers, Transnationalists

Taming Globalization: A Conversation with John Yoo

by John Yoo|

In this podcast, John Yoo discusses his new book, co-authored with Julian Ku, Taming Globalization: International Law, the U.S. Constitution, and the New World Order. Yoo focuses attention on the proliferating sources of international law in treaties, conventions, agreements, and customary international law that transnationalists believe should be more easily incorporated into America's constitutional and domestic law. Yoo's arguments, however, are not reactionary. After highlighting the constitutional and philosophical arguments made by transnationalists on behalf of this posture, Yoo discusses how the Constitution's structure of separation of powers and federalism can be utilized in aiding America in the growing international…

Read More

  • 1
  • 2
  • Next Page »

Book Reviews

A Mirror of the 20th-Century Congress

by Joseph Postell

Wright undermined the very basis of his local popularity—the decentralized nature of the House—by supporting reforms that gave power to the party leaders.

Read More

The Graces of Flannery O'Connor

by Henry T. Edmondson III

O'Connor's correspondence is a goldmine of piercing insight and startling reflections on everything from literature to philosophy to raising peacocks.

Read More

Liberty Classics

Rereading Politica in the Post-Liberal Moment

by Glenn A. Moots

Althusius offers a rich constitutionalism that empowers persons to thrive alongside one another in deliberate communities.

Read More

James Fenimore Cooper and the American Experiment

by Melissa Matthes

In The American Democrat, James Fenimore Cooper defended democracy against both mob rule and majority tyranny.

Read More

Podcasts

Stuck With Decadence

A discussion with Ross Douthat

Ross Douthat discusses with Richard Reinsch his new book The Decadent Society.

Read More

Can the Postmodern Natural Law Remedy Our Failing Humanism?

A discussion with Graham McAleer

Graham McAleer discusses how postmodern natural law can help us think more coherently about human beings and our actions.

Read More

Did the Civil Rights Constitution Distort American Politics?

A discussion with Christopher Caldwell

Christopher Caldwell discusses his new book, The Age of Entitlement.

Read More

America, Land of Deformed Institutions

A discussion with Yuval Levin

Yuval Levin pinpoints that American alienation and anger emerges from our weak political, social, and religious institutions.

Read More

About

Law & Liberty’s focus is on the classical liberal tradition of law and political thought and how it shapes a society of free and responsible persons. This site brings together serious debate, commentary, essays, book reviews, interviews, and educational material in a commitment to the first principles of law in a free society. Law & Liberty considers a range of foundational and contemporary legal issues, legal philosophy, and pedagogy.

The opinions expressed on Law & Liberty are solely those of the contributors to the site and do not reflect the opinions of Liberty Fund.
  • Home
  • About
  • Staff
  • Contact
  • Archive

© 2021 Liberty Fund, Inc.

This site uses local and third-party cookies to analyze traffic. If you want to know more, click here.
By closing this banner or clicking any link in this page, you agree with this practice.Accept Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Necessary Always Enabled

Subscribe
Get Law and Liberty's latest content delivered to you daily
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Close