• About
  • Contact
  • Staff
  • Home
  • Essays
  • Forum
  • Podcasts
  • Book Reviews
  • Liberty Classics

January 27, 2020|Congressional subpoenas, Separation of Powers, Trump Hotel

Restoring the Separation of Powers: A Modest Proposal

by Michael S. Greve|

Trump Hotel, Washington D.C. (Country Gate Productions, shutterstock.com)

 

President Trump’s impeachment has thrown up fiendish separation of powers questions. E.g., suppose the Senate makes a complete joke of its “sole power” to try impeachments: is the House of Representatives a proper party to complain of the Senate’s dereliction, in federal court? On some theories, the House has a legal interest—“standing to sue,” in legal parlance—in protecting its sole power to impeach. If Senator McConnell and the Chief Justice turn the proceeding into a charade, that may be a cognizable injury to the House, suitable for expedited Supreme Court adjudication. See Pelosi v. Roberts, ___ S.Ct. ___ (2020).

Even if you don’t want to recognize that kind of institutional injury, you may still want to grant the House (or the Senate) legal standing to enforce its subpoenas against non-compliant executive officers. Those pending lawsuits have thrown the federal courts into very nasty disputes between the Congress and the Executive, with both sides claiming constitutionally grounded powers to have the other pound sand.

Such internecine separation-of-powers battles aren’t good for the country. Happily, historical practice, constitutional precepts, and institutional incentives provide a harmonious solution.

It is undisputed that each House of Congress has inherent powers to enforce its own subpoenas. Until very recently, however, it did not occur to anyone that courts should be the forum for that enterprise. (A power that depends on another branch’s active assistance isn’t all that inherent.) Instead, Congress itself detained the offenders. Contrary to lore, there was never a designated prison underneath the Capitol. Rather, the House Sergeant-at-Arms detained the offenders at some available congressional office—or, failing that, at a local hotel, with a guard at the door.

Nowadays, the Capitol and all adjacent buildings are hopelessly overcrowded. As Speaker Pelosi has rightly noted, detention in those quarters might prompt Eighth Amendment problems. Thus, the obvious solution is sequestration at the nearby Trump Hotel. Most of the congressionally subpoenaed individuals already practically live there, except they rarely pay up. Detain them there at congressional command: Congress will owe the bill. The detainees cannot conceivably complain of cruel and unusual nourishment, or some such unconstitutional conduct. The House will get its way, by finally imprisoning someone. The federal courts will get their way by getting out of the picture (as they dearly wish and ought to be). And for the Executive, more congressional subpoenas will mean higher revenues. Each branch of government would stay in its lane, just as the Founders intended.

The fact that Mr. Trump’s lawyers are fighting the House subpoenas tooth and nail—instead of conceding the power and urging its constitutionally envisioned and historically validated enforcement—suggests that the President really is surrounded by dopes and babies. His lawyers should recognize, even if his generals do not, that the separation of powers is transactional, just like NATO. He should make money out of it.

Michael S. Greve

Michael S. Greve is a professor at George Mason University School of Law. He is the author of The Upside-Down Constitution (Harvard University Press, 2012).

About the Author

The Limits of Woke Politics
America, Land of Deformed Institutions

Recent Popular Posts

  • Popular
  • Today Week Month All
  • Crisis of the Calhoun United March 20, 2013
  • The Gresham's Law of Law February 13, 2018
  • Obama’s Less Orwellian Terrorism Speech December 7, 2015
  • A Learned but Dismissive Take on Conservative Constitutionalism January 22, 2020
  • A New Reagan October 23, 2017
Ajax spinner

Related Posts

Related

Book Reviews

A Mirror of the 20th-Century Congress

by Joseph Postell

Wright undermined the very basis of his local popularity—the decentralized nature of the House—by supporting reforms that gave power to the party leaders.

Read More

The Graces of Flannery O'Connor

by Henry T. Edmondson III

O’Connor’s correspondence is a goldmine of piercing insight and startling reflections on everything from literature to philosophy to raising peacocks.

Read More

Liberty Classics

Rereading Politica in the Post-Liberal Moment

by Glenn A. Moots

Althusius offers a rich constitutionalism that empowers persons to thrive alongside one another in deliberate communities.

Read More

James Fenimore Cooper and the American Experiment

by Melissa Matthes

In The American Democrat, James Fenimore Cooper defended democracy against both mob rule and majority tyranny.

Read More

Podcasts

Stuck With Decadence

A discussion with Ross Douthat

Ross Douthat discusses with Richard Reinsch his new book The Decadent Society.

Read More

Can the Postmodern Natural Law Remedy Our Failing Humanism?

A discussion with Graham McAleer

Graham McAleer discusses how postmodern natural law can help us think more coherently about human beings and our actions.

Read More

Did the Civil Rights Constitution Distort American Politics?

A discussion with Christopher Caldwell

Christopher Caldwell discusses his new book, The Age of Entitlement.

Read More

America, Land of Deformed Institutions

A discussion with Yuval Levin

Yuval Levin pinpoints that American alienation and anger emerges from our weak political, social, and religious institutions.

Read More

Recent Posts

  • The Just Restraint of the Vicious

    For some contemporary criminal justice reformers, devotion to ideology leads to illogical conclusions about human nature and character change.
    by Gerard T. Mundy

  • Too Immature to be Punished?

    When I look back on my own life, I think I knew by the age of ten that one should not strangle old ladies in their beds.
    by Theodore Dalrymple

  • A Badge of Discrimination

    The British National Health Service has spoken: Wear the badge or declare yourself to be a bigot.
    by Theodore Dalrymple

  • A Judicial Takeover of Asylum Policy?

    Thuraissigiam threatens to make both the law and the facts in every petition for asylum—and there are thousands of them—a matter for the courts.
    by Thomas Ascik

  • The Environmental Uncertainty Principle

    By engaging in such flagrant projection, the Times has highlighted once again the problem with groupthink in the climate discussion.
    by Paul Schwennesen

Blogroll

  • Acton PowerBlog
  • Cafe Hayek
  • Cato@Liberty
  • Claremont
  • Congress Shall Make No Law
  • EconLog
  • Fed Soc Blog
  • First Things
  • Hoover
  • ISI First Principles Journal
  • Legal Theory Blog
  • Marginal Revolution
  • Pacific Legal Liberty Blog
  • Point of Law
  • Power Line
  • Professor Bainbridge
  • Ricochet
  • Right Reason
  • Spengler
  • The American
  • The Beacon Blog
  • The Foundry
  • The Originalism Blog
  • The Public Discourse
  • University Bookman
  • Via Meadia
  • Volokh

Archives

  • All Posts & Publications
  • Book Reviews
  • Liberty Forum
  • Liberty Law Blog
  • Liberty Law Talk

About

Law & Liberty’s focus is on the classical liberal tradition of law and political thought and how it shapes a society of free and responsible persons. This site brings together serious debate, commentary, essays, book reviews, interviews, and educational material in a commitment to the first principles of law in a free society. Law & Liberty considers a range of foundational and contemporary legal issues, legal philosophy, and pedagogy.

The opinions expressed on Law & Liberty are solely those of the contributors to the site and do not reflect the opinions of Liberty Fund.
  • Home
  • About
  • Staff
  • Contact
  • Archive

© 2021 Liberty Fund, Inc.

This site uses local and third-party cookies to analyze traffic. If you want to know more, click here.
By closing this banner or clicking any link in this page, you agree with this practice.Accept Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Necessary Always Enabled

Subscribe
Get Law and Liberty's latest content delivered to you daily
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Close