• About
  • Contact
  • Staff
  • Home
  • Essays
  • Forum
  • Podcasts
  • Book Reviews
  • Liberty Classics

March 23, 2018|CIA, FBI, Islamism, Osama bin Ladin, Terrorism, The Looming Tower

What’s Missing from The Looming Tower

by Mark Judge|

Jeff Daniels as FBI counterterrorism chief John O'Neill in The Looming Tower. (Legendary Pictures / Hulu)

 

It’s the plot of countless Hollywood movies: A sexually repressed totalitarian attempts to gain power over others through violence and intimidation. Footloose, One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, Goodnight and Good Luck, The Handmaid’s Tale — all these films, and many more, feature a killjoy bad guy trying to button up the rest of the liberal world.

This Elmer Gantry type is mostly offstage in The Looming Tower, the captivating miniseries about the events leading to September 11, 2001. The series, currently streaming on Hulu, focuses on the mistakes in the US intelligence community that allowed a handful of hijackers to fly planes into the World Trade Center and Pentagon, killing 3,000 people. The main focus of The Looming Tower is the petty turf wars that prevented the CIA from sharing information with the FBI about Islamic terrorism. It didn’t help that in 1998, when a large part of the series takes place, President Clinton was focused on a sexual scandal involving Monica Lewinsky, a White House intern.

Adapted by screenwriter Dan Futterman from the Pulitzer Prize winning book by Lawrence Wright, and directed by Alex Gibney (Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room, Taxi to the Dark Side, and Going Clear: Scientology and the Prison of Belief), The Looming Tower does not delve into the backstory of how Islamic radicalism came into being. Part political drama and part the-clock-is-ticking thriller, the series leaves out the main thing that set Islamic radicalism in action: Paranoia about sex and Western freedom. While several things can go into making a jihadist – factors such as resentment of Israel, a culture that leaves young men with too much money and too little to do, and a religion that depicts God as punishing, capricious and unbound by reason — the main driver is an obsession with sex.

Jeff Daniels stars as FBI counterterrorism chief John O’Neill and Peter Sarsgaard as Martin Schmidt, head of the CIA’s bin Laden unit. O’Neill is a swearing, drinking and overspending womanizer whose passion and abrasiveness makes him an effective anti-terrorism fighter. He’s the gritty cop who hates bureaucracy. His foil is Schmidt, who is petty and childish, literally shutting down his CIA unit when FBI agents show up so he doesn’t have to share information. Schmidt cannot stand O’Neill, who opts for going into terrorist cells with force and arresting people while Schmidt prefers to pinpoint the enemy with air strikes. Tahar Rahim is outstanding as rookie FBI agent Ali Soufan, one of the only agents familiar with the languages and customs of the Middle East. He works for and is won over by O’Neill.

The Looming Tower shifts from O’Neill, Schmidt and Soufan to terrorist cells in Africa and the Middle East, and then to scenes from a 2004 congressional hearing on 9/11 reveal just how bad the dysfunction in the agencies was. The series is expertly acted, edited and directed. It moves at a good pace, takes time for character development, and is shot crisply.

Still, The Looming Tower begins about 300 pages into Lawrence Wright’s book, skipping the earliest part of the path to 9/11. That story involves a small handful of devout Muslim men whose pathological paranoia about sex led them to radical Islam. The most fascinating of them was Sayyid Qutb (1906-1966), an Egyptian author, educator, Islamic theorist, poet, and the leading member of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood in the 1950s and 1960s. In the early 1940s Qutb was heavily influenced by the work of Nobel Prize-winner French eugenicist Alexis Carrel, who believed that Western modernity fostered selfishness and killed spirituality. In 1966, Qutb was convicted of plotting the assassination of Egyptian president Gamal Abdel Nasser and was executed by hanging.

The book The Looming Tower opens with a long examination of Qutb’s life, giving particular focus to his hatred of the United States. Qutb came to America in 1948 to study at a teacher’s college in Greeley, Colorado. He was appalled by what he saw. “The American girl is well acquainted with her body’s seductive capacity,” he wrote. “She knows seductiveness lies in the round breasts, the full buttocks, and in the shapely thighs, sleek legs and she shows all this and does not hide it.” The boys had “wide, strapping chest[s]” and “ox muscles.” As for the music: “The American’s enjoyment of jazz does not fully begin until he couples it with singing like crude screaming,” Qutb wrote when he returned to Egypt. “It is this music that the savage bushmen created to satisfy their primitive desires.” Note: This was not Las Vegas in 2018. It was Greeley, Colorado, a dry town filled with churches, in 1948.

A religious fanatic, Qutb reasoned that the only possible explanation for the dominance of America after World War II was because Muslims were not devout enough. To defeat the West and bring in a caliphate with universal sharia law, they needed to pray harder, become even more unyieldingly orthodox, endlessly memorize the Koran. This mania is an echo of scientology, which Wright also investigated brilliantly in his book Going Clear. In that weird cult, any sign of personal failure must be met with increasing rounds of “auditing,” a pseudoscientific method of treatment that just makes things worse. In radical Islam, the failure of a person or a culture can be cured by becoming more and more radically committed to God. It’s a terrible cycle.

Qutb was enraged by the foundation of the state of Israel in 1948. But then, he was enraged by most things. He complained that Americans put salt on watermelon. We didn’t know how to give a good haircut, and suffered from “a drought of sentimental sympathy.” On top of that, “Americans intentionally deride what people in the Old World hold sacred.” America and the West are dangerous because they blind people to true values and the real zenith of civilization, which for Qutb began with Muhammad in the seventh century and reached its height in the Middle Ages. Writing for Smithsonian magazine in 2006, David von Drehle connects the dots:

Such grumbling by an unhappy crank would be almost comical but for one fact: a direct line of influence runs from Sayyid Qutb to Osama bin Laden, and to bin Laden’s Egyptian partner in terror, Ayman al-Zawahiri. From them, the line continues to another quietly seething Egyptian sojourning in the United States—the 9/11 hijacker Mohammed Atta. Qutb’s gripes about America require serious attention because they cast light on a question that has been nagging since the fall of the World Trade Center: Why do they hate us?

It’s puzzling why the film The Looming Tower ignores Qutb – after all, if a historical figure who was a devout Christian shared the same attitudes and became a bomber, he would be the focal point of any drama purporting to tell the story of domestic terrorism. Qutb is a prime mover, the engine that set radical Islam in motion. Even without a historical reenactment, the creators of The Looming Tower could have included a scene where O’Neil or the CIA’s Schmidt are briefing their agents on Qutb. To not do so is like the classic mafia film The Godfather being shot without any scenes taking place in in Italy.

The closest The Looming Tower gets to Qutb is when Scotland Yard Chief Inspector (unnamed and played by Tony Curran) takes O’Neil and Agent Soufan to a pub in Manchester, where the FBI has tracked a terrorist. When Soufan asks why the terrorists aren’t doing more, the Chief Inspector just sips his pint. Al-Qaeda he explains, are losers. “These guys are outsiders and misfits,” he says. “They can’t get girlfriends.”

Finally, an accurate assessment of jihadi motivation. The terrorists who started it all were educated, rich, and often from upper-class and respected families who lived in upper-class neighborhoods. It wasn’t poverty or stupidity that set them on the path of destruction. It was fear of freedom, a desire to explain their failures in light of their confidence that God is on their side, and most powerfully, a fear of the feminine. As good as it is, and it is very good, The Looming Tower should have taken the time to explain the core issues that make radical Islam so pathetic.

Mark Judge

Mark Judge is a journalist and filmmaker whose writings have appeared in the Washington Post, the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the Daily Caller.

About the Author

John Calhoun’s California
National Debt, a War between Current and Future Generations?

Recent Popular Posts

  • Popular
  • Today Week Month All
  • The Gresham's Law of Law February 13, 2018
  • Crisis of the Calhoun United March 20, 2013
  • Lessons of the French Revolution February 20, 2020
  • Assessing Our Frayed Society with Byung-Chul Han June 12, 2018
  • Gouverneur Morris on the Preamble to the Constitution March 13, 2019
Ajax spinner

Related Posts

Related

Book Reviews

A Mirror of the 20th-Century Congress

by Joseph Postell

Wright undermined the very basis of his local popularity—the decentralized nature of the House—by supporting reforms that gave power to the party leaders.

Read More

The Graces of Flannery O'Connor

by Henry T. Edmondson III

O’Connor’s correspondence is a goldmine of piercing insight and startling reflections on everything from literature to philosophy to raising peacocks.

Read More

Liberty Classics

Rereading Politica in the Post-Liberal Moment

by Glenn A. Moots

Althusius offers a rich constitutionalism that empowers persons to thrive alongside one another in deliberate communities.

Read More

James Fenimore Cooper and the American Experiment

by Melissa Matthes

In The American Democrat, James Fenimore Cooper defended democracy against both mob rule and majority tyranny.

Read More

Podcasts

Stuck With Decadence

A discussion with Ross Douthat

Ross Douthat discusses with Richard Reinsch his new book The Decadent Society.

Read More

Can the Postmodern Natural Law Remedy Our Failing Humanism?

A discussion with Graham McAleer

Graham McAleer discusses how postmodern natural law can help us think more coherently about human beings and our actions.

Read More

Did the Civil Rights Constitution Distort American Politics?

A discussion with Christopher Caldwell

Christopher Caldwell discusses his new book, The Age of Entitlement.

Read More

America, Land of Deformed Institutions

A discussion with Yuval Levin

Yuval Levin pinpoints that American alienation and anger emerges from our weak political, social, and religious institutions.

Read More

Recent Posts

  • The Just Restraint of the Vicious

    For some contemporary criminal justice reformers, devotion to ideology leads to illogical conclusions about human nature and character change.
    by Gerard T. Mundy

  • Too Immature to be Punished?

    When I look back on my own life, I think I knew by the age of ten that one should not strangle old ladies in their beds.
    by Theodore Dalrymple

  • A Badge of Discrimination

    The British National Health Service has spoken: Wear the badge or declare yourself to be a bigot.
    by Theodore Dalrymple

  • A Judicial Takeover of Asylum Policy?

    Thuraissigiam threatens to make both the law and the facts in every petition for asylum—and there are thousands of them—a matter for the courts.
    by Thomas Ascik

  • The Environmental Uncertainty Principle

    By engaging in such flagrant projection, the Times has highlighted once again the problem with groupthink in the climate discussion.
    by Paul Schwennesen

Blogroll

  • Acton PowerBlog
  • Cafe Hayek
  • Cato@Liberty
  • Claremont
  • Congress Shall Make No Law
  • EconLog
  • Fed Soc Blog
  • First Things
  • Hoover
  • ISI First Principles Journal
  • Legal Theory Blog
  • Marginal Revolution
  • Pacific Legal Liberty Blog
  • Point of Law
  • Power Line
  • Professor Bainbridge
  • Ricochet
  • Right Reason
  • Spengler
  • The American
  • The Beacon Blog
  • The Foundry
  • The Originalism Blog
  • The Public Discourse
  • University Bookman
  • Via Meadia
  • Volokh

Archives

  • All Posts & Publications
  • Book Reviews
  • Liberty Forum
  • Liberty Law Blog
  • Liberty Law Talk

About

Law & Liberty’s focus is on the classical liberal tradition of law and political thought and how it shapes a society of free and responsible persons. This site brings together serious debate, commentary, essays, book reviews, interviews, and educational material in a commitment to the first principles of law in a free society. Law & Liberty considers a range of foundational and contemporary legal issues, legal philosophy, and pedagogy.

The opinions expressed on Law & Liberty are solely those of the contributors to the site and do not reflect the opinions of Liberty Fund.
  • Home
  • About
  • Staff
  • Contact
  • Archive

© 2021 Liberty Fund, Inc.

This site uses local and third-party cookies to analyze traffic. If you want to know more, click here.
By closing this banner or clicking any link in this page, you agree with this practice.Accept Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Necessary Always Enabled

Subscribe
Get Law and Liberty's latest content delivered to you daily
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Close