• About
  • Contact
  • Staff
  • Home
  • Essays
  • Forum
  • Podcasts
  • Book Reviews
  • Liberty Classics

August 26, 2017|Arnold kling, Conservatives, Libertarians, Progressives, The Languages of Politics

The Three Languages of Politics

by Mike Rappaport|

This is the title of an e book by Arnold Kling, who used to blog at our sister site and now blogs at Askblog.  The book, which is well worth reading, argues that conservatives, libertarians, and progressives each have a different language that they use to analyze politics.

According to Kling, conservatives view political issues as involving those who favor the institutions of civilization and those who seek to tear them down.  Libertarians view political issues as a conflict between those who favor liberty and those who seek to impose coercion.  And progressives view political issues as involving a situation where there are oppressors and the oppressed.

There is much to be said for Kling’s argument.  Once you start to think about it, his language view seems quite powerful.  This presentation by Kling about the Three Languages happened to occur a few days after President Trump gave a speech in Poland.  Kling noted that the speech, which had received strong reviews from conservatives, had spoken of the risks to Western Civilization.  This makes perfect sense under Kling’s view.

While I found Kling’s idea quite interesting, I should say that in my own mind all three of these values (as well as others) are important.  I am a consequentialist libertarian.  I start with liberty as the basic building block of good consequences.  But one of the features of liberty is that it allows a sophisticated civilization to grow that is of great value.  And I also believe that liberty greatly helps to prevent oppression and to help the oppressed of the world.  So I care about all of these values, but, as a libertarian, liberty is the basic building block.

Although Kling’s analysis is extremely helpful, I am not sure it really accounts for all of our politics.  While progressives certainly focus on oppression, in my view they are typically statists – that is, they have an unrealistically beneficial view of government power and an unrealistically negative view of markets.  Consider, for example, environmental activists who are a core part of the progressive movement.  The main view here is an anti-market belief that favors strong regulation of the modern economy to protect the environment.  To be sure, there are parts of this view – such as the environmental justice movement, which purports to protect oppressed groups from environmental harm – but this is merely a part of the overall environmentalist view.

That Kling’s analysis does not account for all aspects of modern political views is not a terribly serious criticism.  One shouldn’t expect a simple analysis to account for everything, and his simple analysis does a very good job.  Moreover, Kling is not really attempting to account for the views.  He is most concerned with how modern political ideologies speak.

Mike Rappaport

Professor Rappaport is Darling Foundation Professor of Law at the University of San Diego, where he also serves as the Director of the Center for the Study of Constitutional Originalism. Professor Rappaport is the author of numerous law review articles in journals such as the Yale Law Journal, the Virginia Law Review, the Georgetown Law Review, and the University of Pennsylvania Law Review. His book, Originalism and the Good Constitution, which is coauthored with John McGinnis, was published by the Harvard University Press in 2013.  Professor Rappaport is a graduate of the Yale Law School, where he received a JD and a DCL (Law and Political Theory).

About the Author

The Sex Bureaucrats Are Dug In
The Return of Congressional Government

Recent Popular Posts

  • Popular
  • Today Week Month All
  • The Vanished World of Martin Luther King January 16, 2017
  • The Ballad of Buster Scruggs, a Frontier Anthology January 11, 2019
  • Sam Tanenhaus' Calhounian Discipleship October 7, 2013
  • A Badge of Discrimination March 30, 2020
  • Did Thatcher Leave a Legacy of Freedom? April 8, 2014
Ajax spinner

Related Posts

Related

Book Reviews

A Mirror of the 20th-Century Congress

by Joseph Postell

Wright undermined the very basis of his local popularity—the decentralized nature of the House—by supporting reforms that gave power to the party leaders.

Read More

The Graces of Flannery O'Connor

by Henry T. Edmondson III

O’Connor’s correspondence is a goldmine of piercing insight and startling reflections on everything from literature to philosophy to raising peacocks.

Read More

Liberty Classics

Rereading Politica in the Post-Liberal Moment

by Glenn A. Moots

Althusius offers a rich constitutionalism that empowers persons to thrive alongside one another in deliberate communities.

Read More

James Fenimore Cooper and the American Experiment

by Melissa Matthes

In The American Democrat, James Fenimore Cooper defended democracy against both mob rule and majority tyranny.

Read More

Podcasts

Stuck With Decadence

A discussion with Ross Douthat

Ross Douthat discusses with Richard Reinsch his new book The Decadent Society.

Read More

Can the Postmodern Natural Law Remedy Our Failing Humanism?

A discussion with Graham McAleer

Graham McAleer discusses how postmodern natural law can help us think more coherently about human beings and our actions.

Read More

Did the Civil Rights Constitution Distort American Politics?

A discussion with Christopher Caldwell

Christopher Caldwell discusses his new book, The Age of Entitlement.

Read More

America, Land of Deformed Institutions

A discussion with Yuval Levin

Yuval Levin pinpoints that American alienation and anger emerges from our weak political, social, and religious institutions.

Read More

Recent Posts

  • The Just Restraint of the Vicious

    For some contemporary criminal justice reformers, devotion to ideology leads to illogical conclusions about human nature and character change.
    by Gerard T. Mundy

  • Too Immature to be Punished?

    When I look back on my own life, I think I knew by the age of ten that one should not strangle old ladies in their beds.
    by Theodore Dalrymple

  • A Badge of Discrimination

    The British National Health Service has spoken: Wear the badge or declare yourself to be a bigot.
    by Theodore Dalrymple

  • A Judicial Takeover of Asylum Policy?

    Thuraissigiam threatens to make both the law and the facts in every petition for asylum—and there are thousands of them—a matter for the courts.
    by Thomas Ascik

  • The Environmental Uncertainty Principle

    By engaging in such flagrant projection, the Times has highlighted once again the problem with groupthink in the climate discussion.
    by Paul Schwennesen

Blogroll

  • Acton PowerBlog
  • Cafe Hayek
  • Cato@Liberty
  • Claremont
  • Congress Shall Make No Law
  • EconLog
  • Fed Soc Blog
  • First Things
  • Hoover
  • ISI First Principles Journal
  • Legal Theory Blog
  • Marginal Revolution
  • Pacific Legal Liberty Blog
  • Point of Law
  • Power Line
  • Professor Bainbridge
  • Ricochet
  • Right Reason
  • Spengler
  • The American
  • The Beacon Blog
  • The Foundry
  • The Originalism Blog
  • The Public Discourse
  • University Bookman
  • Via Meadia
  • Volokh

Archives

  • All Posts & Publications
  • Book Reviews
  • Liberty Forum
  • Liberty Law Blog
  • Liberty Law Talk

About

Law & Liberty’s focus is on the classical liberal tradition of law and political thought and how it shapes a society of free and responsible persons. This site brings together serious debate, commentary, essays, book reviews, interviews, and educational material in a commitment to the first principles of law in a free society. Law & Liberty considers a range of foundational and contemporary legal issues, legal philosophy, and pedagogy.

The opinions expressed on Law & Liberty are solely those of the contributors to the site and do not reflect the opinions of Liberty Fund.
  • Home
  • About
  • Staff
  • Contact
  • Archive

© 2021 Liberty Fund, Inc.

This site uses local and third-party cookies to analyze traffic. If you want to know more, click here.
By closing this banner or clicking any link in this page, you agree with this practice.Accept Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Necessary Always Enabled

Subscribe
Get Law and Liberty's latest content delivered to you daily
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Close