• About
  • Contact
  • Staff
  • Home
  • Essays
  • Forum
  • Podcasts
  • Book Reviews
  • Liberty Classics

December 15, 2016|George Washington

George Washington, American

by Richard Samuelson|

In my “Age of Washington” class the other day, I stumbled over the start of his Last Will and Testament.  I regard the will as a partly public and partly private document—the last of his great “farewells,” including his farewell to the Virginia Regiment in 1759, his last Circular to the States in 1783, and, of course, his Presidential Farewell Address of 1796.

It states “I George Washington of Mount Vernon—a citizen of the United States, and lately President of the same, do make, ordain and declare this Instrument.”[1]   Why begin that way?  It occurred to me that it may have had a public purpose in addition to a private one.  “I don’t think that was typical,” I said to the class.  “I wonder what Jefferson said.”  Next thing I know, I was on the computer, googling “Thomas Jefferson’s last will and testament,” and up comes the link. Sure enough, Mr. Jefferson (as we Wahoo’s call him), began his will, “I Thomas Jefferson of Monticello in Albemarle, being of sound mind and in my ordinary state of health, make my last will and testament in manner and form as follows.” Fascinating.

Both begin with the names of their residences, but Washington turns immediately to his status as a citizen of the United States.  Jefferson says nothing about his status as a citizen of the United States or, for that matter, of Virginia.  Instead he merely lists his county of residence, perhaps simply because that was where his will would go through probate.

A few further reflections.  Washington prefaced his Will with the same words with which the Mayflower Compact began, “In the name of God, Amen.”  For God, and then for country.   In his will, Jefferson turns immediately to bequests, “I give to my grandson Francis Eppes, son of my dear deceased daughter Mary Eppes, in fee simple, all that part of my lands at Poplar Forest lying West of the following lines, . . .”   Washington is different.  He begins with his legal obligations, “Imprimus. All my debts, of which there are but few, and none of magnitude, are to be punctually and speedily paid.”   (Another interesting contrast with Jefferson, who begins with a bequest—and ironic given how much greater Jefferson’s debts were.)  Washington then turns to his marital obligation, “To my dearly beloved wife Martha Washington I give and bequeath the use, profit and benefit of my whole Estate, real and personal, for the term of her natural life.”

And then comes his moral obligation as our founding father:  “Upon the decease of my wife, it is my Will & desire that all the Slaves which I hold in my own right, shall receive their freedom.”  Why not emancipate his slaves right away?  That would be insuperably difficult. It would be:

To emancipate them during her life, would, tho’ earnestly wished by me, be attended with such insuperable difficulties on account of their intermixture by Marriages with the dower Negroes, as to excite the most painful sensations, if not disagreeable consequences from the latter, while both descriptions are in the occupancy of the same Proprietor; it not being in my power, under the tenure by which the Dower Negroes are held, to manumit them.

The majority of slaves under Washington’s control were, in fact, held in trust for Martha’s descendants.  Washington had no legal right to free them.  To free those he could free and leave the others in slavery, during Martha’s lifetime, at least, was unworkable.  Note that Washington insists that to free them all, and to do so right away is “earnestly wished” by him.

If we regard the Will as a teaching document, a final farewell from a founding father, the first sentence and the criticism of slavery are of a piece.  America was founded upon the principles of 1776.  According to the “Laws of Nature and Nature’s God,” slavery is a wrong (“in the name of God, Amen.”)  As a “citizen of the United States,” and, we should add, its founding father, Washington had a special responsibility to work to make the practices of the United States come to be in line with the nation’s principles.

Washington’s Will is dated July 9, 1799 (he would die on December 14 of that year, 217 years ago yesterday).  In 1799, Virginia was aflame with resistance to the federal government.  In 1798, the state’s legislature had passed the “Virginia Resolutions,” suggesting that the states should “interpose” themselves between citizens and the federal government, when the federal government transgressed the Constitution’s limits.   Washington was almost certainly aware that the Virginia Resolutions were moderate, compared to the constitutional doctrine of many Virginians in Jefferson’s circle.  Jefferson himself, although Washington did not know it at the time, had asserted the right of states to “nullify” federal law in his draft of the Kentucky Resolutions.  It is possible that by beginning with his status as an American citizen, rather than as a Virginian Washington was trying to remind Americans of the necessity of union if liberty were to survive.

He was almost certainly doing that in freeing his slaves, and in his comments while doing so.  For emphasis, he added later in the document, that his heirs had better not contest that part of his will: “I do moreover most pointedly, and most solemnly enjoin it upon my Executors hereafter named, or the Survivors of them, to see that this clause respecting Slaves, and every part thereof be religiously fulfilled at the Epoch at which it is directed to take place.”

Washington would turn from there to make bequests to schools, both of lower and higher education, where Americans might be raised to be good citizens.  He expressed his concern that Americans were going to Europe for education, and that they would learn principles contrary to those of 1776.

In contrast with his Presidential Farewell Address, which was a final public testament from the founding father as he left the stage, Washington’s Last Will and Testament is the testament of private citizen Washington, doing his duty to his family and his fellow citizens, as is incumbent upon each citizen in a free republic.  Washington knew that nothing from his pen could truly be private.  His Last Will and Testament is a final testament to his genius as the first among equal American citizens.

 

[1] In the edition I use, the abbreviations are removed. They are preserved in the edition available at the link.  I have cleaned up the text similarly.

Richard Samuelson

Richard Samuelson is associate professor of history at California State University, San Bernardino.

About the Author

Using Left Wing Institutions for Right Wing Purposes
Camelot’s Punitive Liberalism

Recent Popular Posts

  • Popular
  • Today Week Month All
  • Crisis of the Calhoun United March 20, 2013
  • The Flight of Fancy Election September 8, 2016
  • The New Nationalism December 8, 2016
  • A New Reagan October 23, 2017
  • The Successes and Failure of John Quincy Adams September 18, 2014
Ajax spinner

Related Posts

Related

Book Reviews

A Mirror of the 20th-Century Congress

by Joseph Postell

Wright undermined the very basis of his local popularity—the decentralized nature of the House—by supporting reforms that gave power to the party leaders.

Read More

The Graces of Flannery O'Connor

by Henry T. Edmondson III

O’Connor’s correspondence is a goldmine of piercing insight and startling reflections on everything from literature to philosophy to raising peacocks.

Read More

Liberty Classics

Rereading Politica in the Post-Liberal Moment

by Glenn A. Moots

Althusius offers a rich constitutionalism that empowers persons to thrive alongside one another in deliberate communities.

Read More

James Fenimore Cooper and the American Experiment

by Melissa Matthes

In The American Democrat, James Fenimore Cooper defended democracy against both mob rule and majority tyranny.

Read More

Podcasts

Stuck With Decadence

A discussion with Ross Douthat

Ross Douthat discusses with Richard Reinsch his new book The Decadent Society.

Read More

Can the Postmodern Natural Law Remedy Our Failing Humanism?

A discussion with Graham McAleer

Graham McAleer discusses how postmodern natural law can help us think more coherently about human beings and our actions.

Read More

Did the Civil Rights Constitution Distort American Politics?

A discussion with Christopher Caldwell

Christopher Caldwell discusses his new book, The Age of Entitlement.

Read More

America, Land of Deformed Institutions

A discussion with Yuval Levin

Yuval Levin pinpoints that American alienation and anger emerges from our weak political, social, and religious institutions.

Read More

Recent Posts

  • The Just Restraint of the Vicious

    For some contemporary criminal justice reformers, devotion to ideology leads to illogical conclusions about human nature and character change.
    by Gerard T. Mundy

  • Too Immature to be Punished?

    When I look back on my own life, I think I knew by the age of ten that one should not strangle old ladies in their beds.
    by Theodore Dalrymple

  • A Badge of Discrimination

    The British National Health Service has spoken: Wear the badge or declare yourself to be a bigot.
    by Theodore Dalrymple

  • A Judicial Takeover of Asylum Policy?

    Thuraissigiam threatens to make both the law and the facts in every petition for asylum—and there are thousands of them—a matter for the courts.
    by Thomas Ascik

  • The Environmental Uncertainty Principle

    By engaging in such flagrant projection, the Times has highlighted once again the problem with groupthink in the climate discussion.
    by Paul Schwennesen

Blogroll

  • Acton PowerBlog
  • Cafe Hayek
  • Cato@Liberty
  • Claremont
  • Congress Shall Make No Law
  • EconLog
  • Fed Soc Blog
  • First Things
  • Hoover
  • ISI First Principles Journal
  • Legal Theory Blog
  • Marginal Revolution
  • Pacific Legal Liberty Blog
  • Point of Law
  • Power Line
  • Professor Bainbridge
  • Ricochet
  • Right Reason
  • Spengler
  • The American
  • The Beacon Blog
  • The Foundry
  • The Originalism Blog
  • The Public Discourse
  • University Bookman
  • Via Meadia
  • Volokh

Archives

  • All Posts & Publications
  • Book Reviews
  • Liberty Forum
  • Liberty Law Blog
  • Liberty Law Talk

About

Law & Liberty’s focus is on the classical liberal tradition of law and political thought and how it shapes a society of free and responsible persons. This site brings together serious debate, commentary, essays, book reviews, interviews, and educational material in a commitment to the first principles of law in a free society. Law & Liberty considers a range of foundational and contemporary legal issues, legal philosophy, and pedagogy.

The opinions expressed on Law & Liberty are solely those of the contributors to the site and do not reflect the opinions of Liberty Fund.
  • Home
  • About
  • Staff
  • Contact
  • Archive

© 2021 Liberty Fund, Inc.

This site uses local and third-party cookies to analyze traffic. If you want to know more, click here.
By closing this banner or clicking any link in this page, you agree with this practice.Accept Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Necessary Always Enabled

Subscribe
Get Law and Liberty's latest content delivered to you daily
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Close