• About
  • Contact
  • Staff
  • Home
  • Essays
  • Forum
  • Podcasts
  • Book Reviews
  • Liberty Classics

Archives for January 2012

January 24, 2012|

Liberty Forum on the Constitutional Amendment Process

by Mike Rappaport|

The Liberty Forum feature of this site is an exciting one.  It provides for an essay on a topic of interest, followed by two responses by commentators, and then a possible reply by the original author.  The first Liberty Forum was written by the excellent Philip Hamburger on the topic of the proper office of the judge, a subject that Professor Hamburger knows something about. The second Liberty Forum was written by yours truly on the problems created by the failure of the national convention amendment process and the consequences of that  failure for the protection of federalism.  The piece was…

Read More

January 23, 2012|Affordable Care Act, HHS, HRSA, Kathleen Sebelius, U.S. Code

The Bureaucracy’s Creep Against Life

by Michael S. Greve|

This past Friday, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) postponed for a year (until August 2013) the effective date for an interim final rule (IFR) that would require many religious employers to cover under their health insurance plans preventive pregnancy services, from contraceptives to sterilization and “morning-after” pills. Churches may obtain exemptions, but many religious employers such as hospitals, colleges, and social service organizations may not. “I believe this proposal strikes the appropriate balance between respecting religious freedom and increasing access to important preventive services,” HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius declared in a press release. Sure it does. The Catholic Church and the many other religious institutions that protested a rule that would compel payment for practices in violation of their teaching and convictions were faking it; they just wanted a year to change their minds.

Read More

January 22, 2012|Commerce Clause, Four Horsemen, Natural Right, New Deal, Progressivism, Supreme Court

The Four Horsemen of the Supreme Court

by Richard M. Reinsch II|

From the stacks: Hadley Arkes on the constitutional philosophy of the Justices who resisted the New Deal.

January 22, 2012|Economic Freedom

Economic Freedom in the US and Canada

by Mike Rappaport|

The Wall Street Journal and the Heritage Foundation have released the 2012 Index of Economic Freedom.  I have closely followed this Index since it was first released in 1995.  Sadly, but not unexpectedly, the United States has fallen once again.  This is another reflection of the worsening state of our polity – a decline for which, in my opinion, George Bush and the Republicans bear some responsibility and Barack Obama and the Democrats bear even more. The United States has fallen significantly from a high of the 5th most economically free country in the world with a 81.2 in 2006 and…

Read More

January 21, 2012|Alexander Hamilton, compound republic, European Union, Federalist 15, James Madison

The EU and Us

by Michael S. Greve|

Having had my fun at the European Union’s expense, perhaps it’s time to move past Lufthansa jokes (although I do have a few more) and pay more serious attention to the EU and its federalism. There’s little room for American gloating or Schadenfreude: the ongoing EU disaster is hanging over our economy; and besides, our own federalism isn’t in such terrific shape, either. Read on to learn more.

January 20, 2012|

Recess Appointments and Technological Change

by Mike Rappaport|

A short follow up to yesterday's post on Recess Appointments. One way to think about how odd the change in the law of recess appointments (from original meaning to modern practice) has been is to think about it in reference to technological and social change.  We now live in a world where, due to a tremendous reduction in transportation costs and other factors, recesses are much shorter.  In the old days, they could be 6 – 9 months.  These days they rarely exceed one month, and are often much shorter. This change should have reduced the need for recess appointments.  Instead,…

Read More

January 19, 2012|ARRA, James Blumstein, Medicaid, MOE, Obamacare, PPACA, Robert Helms

Obamacaid Revisited

by Michael S. Greve|

In the pending Obamacare litigation, the plaintiff-states argue that Title II of the Affordable Care Act (“Obamacaid”) unconstitutionally “coerces” them to participate in a grand expansion of Medicaid. I’ve argued here and there (link no longer available) that the plaintiffs will and should lose that argument. A terrific amicus brief (link no longer available) by Vanderbilt Law School professor James Blumstein makes a powerful case on the other side.

Ultimately, Jim’s brief doesn’t fully persuade me. But it comes very, very close on account of its recognition that Obamacaid’s crucial problem has to do with the bilateral risk of opportunistic defection from a pre-existing, quasi-contractual relation (Medicaid), not with some “economic coercion” story about federalism’s “balance” and the poor, pitiful states and their faithful public servants. (For ConLaw dorks: the key cases are Pennhurst and Printz, not South Dakota v. Dole or Steward Machine.) I hope to explain sometime next week; today, a few additional remarks on economic coercion.

Read More

January 19, 2012|Originalism, Recess Appointments

The Original Meaning of the Recess Appointment Clause

by Mike Rappaport|

While I have blogged about this matter elsewhere on the Originalism Blog, I thought I would present my views on the issue on the Liberty Law Blog. In 2005, I wrote a long article investigating the original meaning of the Recess Appointments Clause.  It turns out that the power of the President to make recess appointments is much narrower under the original meaning than it is under current practice. The original meaning of the Recess Appointments Clause allows Presidents to make recess appointments, but only when (1) the vacancy arose during a recess (2) the appointment is made during that same recess, and (3) that…

Read More

January 18, 2012|Atlas Shrugged, internet freedom, Minecraft, PIPA, SOPA, Wikipedia

Enough

by Michael S. Greve|

My ten-year-old son just informed me that not only Wikipedia but also Minecraft and other sites have temporarily gone dark in protest of SOPA and PIPA. What’s that, he wants to know. Read more to find out.

January 18, 2012|Angela Merkel, European Union, Germany, Italy, Poland, Radek Sikorski, shipwreck

EU Under Water

by Michael S. Greve|

The shipwreck off the Italian coast, Bret Stephens writes in the Wall Street Journal, is an apt metaphor for the entire continent. Read more to find out why.
  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next Page »

Book Reviews

A Mirror of the 20th-Century Congress

by Joseph Postell

Wright undermined the very basis of his local popularity—the decentralized nature of the House—by supporting reforms that gave power to the party leaders.

Read More

The Graces of Flannery O'Connor

by Henry T. Edmondson III

O'Connor's correspondence is a goldmine of piercing insight and startling reflections on everything from literature to philosophy to raising peacocks.

Read More

Liberty Classics

Rereading Politica in the Post-Liberal Moment

by Glenn A. Moots

Althusius offers a rich constitutionalism that empowers persons to thrive alongside one another in deliberate communities.

Read More

James Fenimore Cooper and the American Experiment

by Melissa Matthes

In The American Democrat, James Fenimore Cooper defended democracy against both mob rule and majority tyranny.

Read More

Podcasts

Stuck With Decadence

A discussion with Ross Douthat

Ross Douthat discusses with Richard Reinsch his new book The Decadent Society.

Read More

Can the Postmodern Natural Law Remedy Our Failing Humanism?

A discussion with Graham McAleer

Graham McAleer discusses how postmodern natural law can help us think more coherently about human beings and our actions.

Read More

Did the Civil Rights Constitution Distort American Politics?

A discussion with Christopher Caldwell

Christopher Caldwell discusses his new book, The Age of Entitlement.

Read More

America, Land of Deformed Institutions

A discussion with Yuval Levin

Yuval Levin pinpoints that American alienation and anger emerges from our weak political, social, and religious institutions.

Read More

About

Law & Liberty’s focus is on the classical liberal tradition of law and political thought and how it shapes a society of free and responsible persons. This site brings together serious debate, commentary, essays, book reviews, interviews, and educational material in a commitment to the first principles of law in a free society. Law & Liberty considers a range of foundational and contemporary legal issues, legal philosophy, and pedagogy.

The opinions expressed on Law & Liberty are solely those of the contributors to the site and do not reflect the opinions of Liberty Fund.
  • Home
  • About
  • Staff
  • Contact
  • Archive

© 2021 Liberty Fund, Inc.

This site uses local and third-party cookies to analyze traffic. If you want to know more, click here.
By closing this banner or clicking any link in this page, you agree with this practice.Accept Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Necessary Always Enabled

Subscribe
Get Law and Liberty's latest content delivered to you daily
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Close